Message from Arun: If you do not have any wires connected across your artboards, then XD will publish all the screens starting from left to right and top to bottom.
Do you try doing that and see if this helps you?
If you do not have any wires connected across your artboards, then XD will publish all the screens starting from left to right and top to bottom.
Do you try doing that and see if this helps you?
If I understood your ask correctly - Save as of an existing XD document should not carry over existing published links from it. Is that understanding accurate?
2 votes2 comments · Adobe XD: Feature Requests » 04 : Sharing on the web · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
I agree with your pain point here. If you wanted a secure way of sharing, would you not prefer the option of 'Only invited people' can access or the Private link sharing instead of password protected? This will have automatic login and other benefits as well in terms of commenting on your prototypes. Thanks!
91 votesfeature-started · 15 comments · Adobe XD: Feature Requests » 10: Developer Handoff · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
Hover not working in the prototype link is a bug and we are looking into it on priority. Sorry for you to have encountered this and we will address it shortly.
1 votebug-needs-more-info · 2 comments · Adobe XD: Bugs (Read-Only) » Share for Review · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
Can you explain what did you mean by choosing the order of appearance?
I am assuming you will lay your artboards in a manner that you want your clients to look at. Where do you want the choosing the order to be?
471 votesfeature-under-review · 53 comments · Adobe XD: Feature Requests » 02 : Prototype mode · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
Thank you for reaching out and submitting your request to us!
Today in XD, you can actually export the artboards as a single PDF file via File-->Export option and set the export format as PDF. What this does is that it will put each artboard an image and export into PDF format. Encourage you to give this a try and let us know if this helps you?
Note that there is no interactivity information present currently, which I think is your point no 2 & 3.
4 votes4 comments · Adobe XD: Feature Requests » 02 : Prototype mode · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
Arun has an additional question for you in the comments.
Please note that we are going to provide UX flow view along with Grid view that you can switch between. For a design specs link, you will have the option to switch view between Grid and UX flow while viewing it on web.
Hope that will solve your concern about not being able to see your design layout and structure?
You can still choose to share a "Design Review" link which is essentially the Prototype or choose to share a "Development" link which is now prototype+specs information for the artboards that you have selected.
Essentially, you do have a way to just share prototype link separately. Its your design spec link which has become richer.
Please let us know if this is not what you are seeing in the build? Thanks!
7 votes2 comments · Adobe XD: Feature Requests » 04 : Sharing on the web · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
Thank you for reaching out to us with your requests.
If you are creating a public link in XD, it can be accessed by anyone who has the link and it has no security layer. In this case, @mention only lists names of the users who has commented once. Please note that anyone with the link can potentially open it in a web browser and view the content. They do not need to sign-in at all. For @mention to list names, we will need to know the users accessing it. In other words, users who have signed in to access it.
This is true for Guest users as well. When you choose to get in as a Guest user, you do not need to login using any email ID. @mention will not be able to send any notifications to such names that we do not know anything about.
On the other hand, if you are using a private link published from XD, then to access such a link, users will have to login using their Adobe ID (adobe ID can also be a free account!). In this scenario, @mention will list all the users whom you have invited on that private link (without them having to comment at all). This is because, we already know who are the invitees and hence know their email ID's.
Hope this helps clarify your questions and let's you know how @mention currently works in different types of shared links?
Happy to answer any other questions or concerns.
2 votesfeature-under-review · 2 comments · Adobe XD: Bugs (Read-Only) » Share for Review · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
To better understand the issue - what you are asking for is if the screen shown when you load a design specs link in browser has changed or not. Is that correct?
UX flow view in design specs has been replaced with Grid view. Please let us know what exactly are you missing in this Grid view?
3 votes4 comments · Adobe XD: Feature Requests » 10: Developer Handoff · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
Thank you for your feedback. I see your point about "having to explain to the engineers which artboards are from which sections".
Is the main concern of your developers about not being able to see the flow fully (because Grid view is currently showing 1 level deep linked screens), or is the concern more around Designer not being able to use design specs and communicate something around a group of artboards?
If it is about the first one, then we can show the flow from a given artboard to another linked artboard and then extend this capability to see further links below in Grid view.
But if the concern is about second point, then one way to achieve grouping will be by - naming your artboards within a group with similar names, and then filtering them using the search capability in Grid view.
Please note that we are hearing all your feedback and want to hear your thoughts on this.
1 votebug-needs-more-info · 2 comments · Adobe XD: Bugs (Read-Only) » Share · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
Can you check with your IT admin if 'Sharing' is enabled for Adobe XD? If yes, then they will have to allow sharing from Admin console for you to be able to publish.
For some reason you were able to publish it since Oct 2018 release, but it might have stopped because of the Sharing restrictions enabled by your admin.
1 votebug-needs-more-info · 1 comment · Adobe XD: Bugs (Read-Only) » Share · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
We are sorry that your colleague is not able to open Design Spec link.
By looking at this error, we are suspecting that the original link has got deleted somehow.
1. To confirm this, can you try opening https://assets.adobe.com/links in your web browser and login using your Adobe ID?
2. Under the 'Published' section, you should see a list of all links that you have published from XD.
3. Can you see the Design Spec link that you are talking about?
6 votes7 comments · Adobe XD: Feature Requests » 04 : Sharing on the web · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
While I see your point about browser chrome still present when viewing a prototype on mobile web browser, I am not sure I understood the issue with performance.
Can you elaborate more on why you felt the performance of viewing prototypes on mobile web is slower? Any specific examples that you can share will help us dig into this further and improve the experience.
On the viewing experience as well, we have recently made some improvements where-in maximum real estate is now used to show the prototype in its glory. Browser chrome on most browsers go away after some time allowing you to see the full height prototype. Please give this a try and let us know your feedback. I am eager to hear more from you.
50 votes18 comments · Adobe XD: Feature Requests » 04 : Sharing on the web · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
While Zoom control is not currently present in the prototype web, but I feel that you are seeing the design fitting in fully in the browser and not showing up width wise? Is that accurate?
Is it possible for you to share the prototype link with us to take a look and confirm it?
1. To make your artboard that is large in size (such as 1920x5950) span across the width of browser, you should set "Scrolling" property of the artboard to "vertical" in the properties inspector within Adobe XD.
2. After setting it as vertical, set the viewport height accordingly to define a page fold for your design.
3. If you do not want to specify page fold, then set the viewport height value same as your artboard height.
This will fit the entire width of your design to the size of web browser and allow you to scroll vertically like a web page.
Hope this helps?
43 votes12 comments · Adobe XD: Feature Requests » 04 : Sharing on the web · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
Thank you for submitting your request to us. I agree with you that this is an important use case.
Regarding the already created links - I am assuming these are all Private links that you are talking about?
Please note that the link that has been created will continue to exist even if the agency who had originally created does not renew the license. As long as you and your team members can login using the Adobe ID to which you were invited originally on that link, you can continue to open and view it.
Link will only cease to exist if the owner of that link (user who had originally created it), goes ahead and manually deletes it.
Having said that, I am curious to know if you are also wanting to become the owner of that link and would want to re-publish/update design from original XD document to that same link?
The video linked shows content being resized to fit based on browser window size. This is working as designed.
FWIW, overlays are static and will not move based on scroll position.
Is it possible that what you’re seeing is working as expected but not as you’d like it to?
This setting of Scrolling:None being set when you choose a custom artboard in XD is not new, and has been the same since the beginning. This setting was not getting respected while viewing in browser earlier and hence you might not have noticed it.
Do you think the default setting in case of Custom artboards should also be set to Vertical?
In what scenarios would you actually want to set the scrolling to None?
Do you expected the design to fit width wise at all times, and scroll vertically (artboard height will not be fit into the browser height)?
While creating your artboards, have you set "Scrolling" setting in properties inspector to "None"? If yes, then recommend you to change it to "Vertical". Make sure the viewport value shown is same as your artboard's height.
If you publish again, you will see the desired result in browser.
The reason it was getting fit earlier is because you have set Scrolling to None. We have to respect this setting and fit the entire artboard into the available viewport.
Let me know if this helps?
15 votesfeature-in-the-backlog · 5 comments · Adobe XD: Feature Requests » 04 : Sharing on the web · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
Thank you for submitting your request to us. We have heard about this in the past and I agree with you that being able to create a group of people to share prototypes is a lot easier to manage.
Please note that we have added this into our backlog and will work on it based on the prioritisation and number votes for this request.
3 votesbug-needs-more-info · 3 comments · Adobe XD: Bugs (Read-Only) » Share · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
Can you share your email id with me? We have seen in the past that this error 44:47 might be encountered because of some service blocking for some email domains. I will get that checked with the right team and get back to you.
2 votesbug-needs-more-info · 1 comment · Adobe XD: Bugs (Read-Only) » Prototype · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
12 votesbug-needs-more-info · 7 comments · Adobe XD: Feature Requests » 04 : Sharing on the web · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
We have provided a fix for this issue recently in XD 12.0 release. Request you to give it a try, and access your prototype links on mobile devices again. You should now see the designs taking full width available, and let it overflow vertically if height is greater than available height of the device.
Do let us know if you are still seeing the same issue?
What you mentioned here about mobile browsers having lesser vertical area available to display content is the main reason why this issue is happening.
We are trying to fit height of the design first, and then reduce width proportionally to maintain aspect ratio. This is why you see white gaps on left and right as the width has reduced slightly than its original size. This is the only way we can fit in the entire design within the available viewable area inside of the mobile browser.
The other option is to always fit to width of the design and then let there be vertical scrolling possible to view any content that would fall beyond the available viewable height in the browser. Do you think that would be acceptable behavior?