alanjawn

My feedback

  1. 63 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    12 comments  ·  Adobe XD: Feature Requests » 01 : Design mode  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    alanjawn supported this idea  · 
  2. 6,609 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    alanjawn supported this idea  · 
  3. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Adobe XD: Feature Requests » 01 : Design mode  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    alanjawn shared this idea  · 
  4. 7 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Adobe XD: Feature Requests » 01 : Design mode  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    alanjawn commented  · 

    for now I realized an easy workaround to do multiple layers at once is to shift+select the layers you want to hide and use the key commands to show/hide [CMD + ,] (also works for lock/unlock [CMD + L])

    alanjawn commented  · 

    If I have multiple items selected and I click to show/hide or lock/unlock it should perform the action for all of the selected items.

    If I have 3 items selected in the layer panel and I click the eye to hide a layer it would hide all 3 items so I don't have to click hide 2 more times. This should work the same for lock.

    alanjawn supported this idea  · 
  5. 10 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Adobe XD: Feature Requests » 01 : Design mode  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    alanjawn supported this idea  · 
  6. 9 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    alanjawn supported this idea  · 
  7. 101 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    28 comments  ·  Adobe XD: Feature Requests » 01 : Design mode  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    alanjawn supported this idea  · 
  8. 20 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    8 comments  ·  Adobe XD: Feature Requests » 01 : Design mode  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    alanjawn supported this idea  · 
  9. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Adobe XD: Feature Requests » 01 : Design mode  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    alanjawn shared this idea  · 
  10. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Adobe XD: Feature Requests » 01 : Design mode  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    alanjawn shared this idea  · 
  11. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Adobe XD: Feature Requests » 01 : Design mode  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    alanjawn shared this idea  · 
  12. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Adobe XD: Feature Requests » 01 : Design mode  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    alanjawn commented  · 

    Hi Elaine,

    I was thinking when you right click on an asset you would be able to select reveal in assets (currently that option is not there if asset panel is not open), not during hover. So yes you would lose where you are in the layers panel but it would be of your choosing because you would have clicked reveal in assets panel. I would assume then if you switch back to the layers and you have not clicked on another element, the same layer would be selected so you would not "lose" anything.

    alanjawn commented  · 

    I’m more wanting to be able to right click on an object and be able to click reveal color in assets regardless if the assets panel is open or not. Right now if layers panel is open and you right click an object the option to reveal colors in asset panel it is not there, you have to switch it to the assets panel then go back to the object and try again. I don’t think it would be a problem for anyone losing where they are in the layers if it hot-swapped you right on over to the assets side of things because you would have intentionally clicked to go there.

    Right now even though I know this is how it works I find myself forgetting to check to see what panel is open before I check out a color. Like I’m in the zone looking at stuff and I’m like hey is that the right gray color, so I right click and I’m like oh snap! The option isn’t there to reveal it, now I gotta mouse down to the corner and switch panels. (the CMD Y shortcut is too far and confusing for one handed use). I don’t think anybody loses anything by allowing that kind of interaction and it just seems easier to not have to remember what panel is open when you are making sure your colors are spec’d out.

    I could see an improvement to this kinda thing by allowing both the assets and layers panel (plug-ins too) the ability to be open all at once by converting them to floating panels that can be docked side by side, or on another monitor, similar to illustrator and photoshop. Just last week I was going back and forth over and over again double clicking through groups and layers making sure I was on the background of a button, then going back to colors, changing colors, then to the next screen...rinse and repeat. The way the shortcut cycles through and closes the panel just wasn’t making sense so I was constantly mousing back and forth from artboard selecting and object, showing layers, double-checking the right layer was selected, then back down to switch to colors, selecting colors etc. just thinking aye! there has to be a better way every time!

    alanjawn shared this idea  · 
  13. 69 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    11 comments  ·  Adobe XD: Feature Requests » 01 : Design mode  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    alanjawn supported this idea  · 
  14. 3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Adobe XD: Feature Requests » 01 : Design mode  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Sherif has a response for you: Alan,

    Today in XD, you could select any layer inside the component and add a shadow to it, and it render outside the component bounding box. Does that solve your use case? if not, could you please add more detail into what you’re trying to achieve.

    alanjawn shared this idea  · 
  15. 66 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    21 comments  ·  Adobe XD: Feature Requests » 01 : Design mode  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    This is something we’d like to get more feedback on.

    a) Some apps (such as Adobe Illustrator and InDesign) behave the way XD does now: reducing fill opacity (not overall object opacity) keeps the whole shadow visible but reduces its opacity in proportion with the fill color’s opacity. At zero fill opacity, the shadow is completely gone along with the fill (unless you have a border, in which case you have a thin ring-shaped shadow left).

    b) Other apps (such as Photoshop or Sketch) behave differently: reducing fill opacity leaves the shadow’s opacity at full strength, but clips the shadow so you don’t see it through the translucent fill. At zero fill opacity, in the middle of the shape you can see what’s behind it completely unobscured, but outside the shape’s edges you still see the drop shadow at full strength.

    Which one do people prefer? Do you need to…

    alanjawn supported this idea  · 
  16. 121 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    17 comments  ·  Adobe XD: Feature Requests » 01 : Design mode  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    alanjawn supported this idea  · 
  17. 209 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    As a workaround for this featire you can make your home artboard an “index” page which links to the different views/subsets of your design. When you share your design and visit the URL you can click through to the real home artboards and copy the URL (each artboard has it’s own URL on the shared link). You can then share these URLs to link people to a subset of your design.

    We hope to be able to formalize this feature in the future.

    alanjawn supported this idea  · 
  18. 17 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Adobe XD: Feature Requests » 01 : Design mode  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    alanjawn supported this idea  · 
  19. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Adobe XD: Feature Requests » 01 : Design mode  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    alanjawn shared this idea  · 
  20. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Adobe XD: Bugs (Read-Only) » Functional  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    alanjawn commented  · 

    Here's what I've been told: (from Pinsky)

    • If you copy/paste from another doc, you should be able to convert to local.
    • If you link assets from a cloud document, you cannot unless the link is broken.

    alanjawn supported this idea  · 
    alanjawn commented  · 

    I am not seeing it either?

← Previous 1 3 4 5 6 7

Feedback and Knowledge Base