Settings and activity
8 results found
-
260 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous supported this idea · -
121 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
2,013 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
1,046 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
58 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
149 votes
This is something we’d like to get more feedback on.
a) Some apps (such as Adobe Illustrator and InDesign) behave the way XD does now: reducing fill opacity (not overall object opacity) keeps the whole shadow visible but reduces its opacity in proportion with the fill color’s opacity. At zero fill opacity, the shadow is completely gone along with the fill (unless you have a border, in which case you have a thin ring-shaped shadow left).
b) Other apps (such as Photoshop or Sketch) behave differently: reducing fill opacity leaves the shadow’s opacity at full strength, but clips the shadow so you don’t see it through the translucent fill. At zero fill opacity, in the middle of the shape you can see what’s behind it completely unobscured, but outside the shape’s edges you still see the drop shadow at full strength.
Which one do people prefer? Do you need to…
Anonymous supported this idea · -
639 votes
Hi everyone,
We’ve started working on multiple fills and borders, with plans to extend to this multiple shadows in the future.
Best,
DanAnonymous supported this idea · -
262 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous commentedFor me this feature is absolutely necessary. Also the height of a text element should be determined by the line-height. Otherwise working with a baseline grid would be impossible.
Anonymous supported this idea ·
I understand the basic idea of why it’s done as it’s done, but for me it proves to be quite bothersome to get unwanted layers selected all the time. Maybe selecting locked layers could be implemented with a keyboard shortcut, or something.