Skip to content

Settings and activity

6 results found

  1. 1,540 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    This one is killing me. Might be a mild exaggeration and a bit of hyperbole but at the same time, I am quite literally physically dying due to this problem.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  2. 513 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  3. 56 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Such an important feature.

    When checking that elements across multiple pages (artboards) are consistently aligned it is so much more efficient to just be able to skip back and forth between artboards at the same zoom and viewport positioning.

    Aside from that it's also a really efficient way to page through a design when getting a feel for where you are at overall.

    Easily the thing causing me the most issues when switching from Fireworks.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I don't understand how this doesn't have vastly more votes! Being able to jump from artboard to artboard quickly without a change in zoom level or artboard positioning within the viewport is such an important feature for effectively ensuring elements are position consistently / pixel perfectly across pages.

    Not to mention it makes navigating through a design whilst designing vastly more efficient. This is the only lacking feature I have come across in XD that genuinely makes it a struggle to move from Fireworks.

    Does this have so few votes because there is a way of doing we are missing?

  4. 68 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  5. 1,421 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  6. 1,526 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Anonymous supported this idea  ·