Skip to content

Settings and activity

21 results found

  1. 5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Henry supported this idea  · 
  2. 52 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Henry supported this idea  · 
  3. 237 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Henry supported this idea  · 
  4. 44 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Henry supported this idea  · 
  5. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Henry shared this idea  · 
  6. 260 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Henry supported this idea  · 
  7. 296 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Henry supported this idea  · 
  8. 316 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Henry supported this idea  · 
  9. 1,809 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Henry supported this idea  · 
  10. 851 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Henry supported this idea  · 
  11. 2,013 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Henry supported this idea  · 
  12. 5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Henry supported this idea  · 
  13. 533 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    feature-under-review  ·  MrTalin responded

    Hey Ryan! Definitely something I’ve been looking for as well!

    I can safely say this is a feature we’d all like to see in XD.

    Henry supported this idea  · 
  14. 558 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    feature-started  ·  Hoyle responded

    We’ve begun working on an easier way to crop your images without using an image mask and will be releasing this in an upcoming release!

    Hoyle
    Product Manager, Adobe XD

    Henry supported this idea  · 
  15. 10 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Henry supported this idea  · 
  16. 149 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    This is something we’d like to get more feedback on.

    a) Some apps (such as Adobe Illustrator and InDesign) behave the way XD does now: reducing fill opacity (not overall object opacity) keeps the whole shadow visible but reduces its opacity in proportion with the fill color’s opacity. At zero fill opacity, the shadow is completely gone along with the fill (unless you have a border, in which case you have a thin ring-shaped shadow left).

    b) Other apps (such as Photoshop or Sketch) behave differently: reducing fill opacity leaves the shadow’s opacity at full strength, but clips the shadow so you don’t see it through the translucent fill. At zero fill opacity, in the middle of the shape you can see what’s behind it completely unobscured, but outside the shape’s edges you still see the drop shadow at full strength.

    Which one do people prefer? Do you need to…

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Henry commented  · 

    Option B is my preference. You can recreate option A using option B if you want. Or add a per-shadow preference as suggested below so you can toggle the behaviour.

    Henry supported this idea  · 
  17. 639 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Henry supported this idea  · 
  18. 40 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Henry supported this idea  · 
  19. 88 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Henry commented  · 

    Also commented here: https://adobexd.uservoice.com/forums/353007-adobe-xd-feature-requests/suggestions/35455297-allow-duplicate-colors-in-assets-panel

    Please consider implementing this. It's a huge pain for us at the moment. I would love to be able to define colour assets by function (background, dark background, button, dark button, header, dark header, etc.) but in some cases I use the same colour for different functions. It's not possible to achieve this with the current implementation.

    It's also a problem for defining light/dark mode colours. I could define a colour (Blue) and a dark mode equivalent (Blue Dark), but it's not always the case that everything that uses blue in light mode will use the equivalent dark blue in dark mode. Different elements may need a different treatment, and it becomes messy to keep track of this and communicate to developers.

    Henry supported this idea  · 
  20. 133 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Henry commented  · 

    Please consider implementing this. It's a huge pain for us at the moment. I would love to be able to define colour assets by function (background, dark background, button, dark button, header, dark header, etc.) but in some cases I use the same colour for different functions. It's not possible to achieve this with the current implementation.

    It's also a problem for defining light/dark mode colours. I could define a colour (Blue) and a dark mode equivalent (Blue Dark), but it's not always the case that everything that uses blue in light mode will use the equivalent dark blue in dark mode. Different elements may need a different treatment, and it becomes messy to keep track of this and communicate to developers.

    Henry supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1