Settings and activity
14 results found
-
1,774 votesfeature-under-review · 81 comments · Adobe XD: Feature Requests (Read-Only) » 01 : Design mode · Admin →Андрей Берестовой supported this idea ·
-
62 votesАндрей Берестовой supported this idea ·
-
638 votesfeature-under-review · 117 comments · Adobe XD: Feature Requests (Read-Only) » 01 : Design mode · Admin →Андрей Берестовой supported this idea ·
-
800 votesАндрей Берестовой supported this idea ·
-
806 votesfeature-under-review · 58 comments · Adobe XD: Feature Requests (Read-Only) » 01 : Design mode · Admin →Андрей Берестовой supported this idea ·
-
1,809 votesАндрей Берестовой supported this idea ·
-
1,728 votesАндрей Берестовой supported this idea ·
-
2,013 votesАндрей Берестовой supported this idea ·
-
1,851 votesАндрей Берестовой supported this idea ·
-
149 votes
This is something we’d like to get more feedback on.
a) Some apps (such as Adobe Illustrator and InDesign) behave the way XD does now: reducing fill opacity (not overall object opacity) keeps the whole shadow visible but reduces its opacity in proportion with the fill color’s opacity. At zero fill opacity, the shadow is completely gone along with the fill (unless you have a border, in which case you have a thin ring-shaped shadow left).
b) Other apps (such as Photoshop or Sketch) behave differently: reducing fill opacity leaves the shadow’s opacity at full strength, but clips the shadow so you don’t see it through the translucent fill. At zero fill opacity, in the middle of the shape you can see what’s behind it completely unobscured, but outside the shape’s edges you still see the drop shadow at full strength.
Which one do people prefer? Do you need to…
Андрей Берестовой supported this idea · -
639 votes
Hi everyone,
We’ve started working on multiple fills and borders, with plans to extend to this multiple shadows in the future.
Best,
DanAn error occurred while saving the comment Андрей Берестовой supported this idea · -
1,792 votesfeature-started · 39 comments · Adobe XD: Feature Requests (Read-Only) » 02 : Prototype mode · Admin →Андрей Берестовой supported this idea ·
-
8,057 votes
Reopening the feature request, based on feedback.
Андрей Берестовой supported this idea · -
52 votesfeature-in-the-backlog · 10 comments · Adobe XD: Feature Requests (Read-Only) » 01 : Design mode · Admin →
An error occurred while saving the comment Андрей Берестовой commentedWhen will this opportunity be finally realized? In Figma, this has been working for a long time.
I create SVG icons in Adobe Illustrator, create an artboard with a size of 18x18 pixels, leave safe areas, and therefore the physical size of the icon object is less than 18x18 pixels. When importing into XD, I have to rebuild the icon not according to its artboard, but according to its physical dimensions, and this takes a lot of time if the icon is not symmetrical.
In XD, as I understand it, the concept of "Frame" is missing, as in Figma, and therefore the icon is imported without taking into account the artboard.Андрей Берестовой supported this idea ·
В данном случае "уже прошло 3 года", но для Adobe это видно не срок. С каждым новым обновлением той же Figma Adobe XD всё больше выглядит некой породией на серьезный инструмент.