Settings and activity
14 results found
-
1,774 votesfeature-under-review · 81 comments · Adobe XD: Feature Requests (Read-Only) » 01 : Design mode · Admin →
Андрей Берестовой supported this idea ·
-
62 votes
-
Tabbed design view for multiple files
-
Multple Windows.png 731 KB -
Screen Shot 2021-01-29 at 4.14.22 PM.png 462 KB -
Screen Shot 2021-01-29 at 4.14.22 PM.png 462 KB -
Screen Shot 2020-02-27 at 10.03.53 AM.png 57 KB -
needs resizing and scrollbars.JPG 110 KB -
1 (3).png 1 KB -
1 (2).png 2 KB -
1 (1).png 66 KB -
Screen_Shot_2016-05-09_at_6.02.21_PM.png 21 KB
638 votesfeature-under-review · 117 comments · Adobe XD: Feature Requests (Read-Only) » 01 : Design mode · Admin → -
-
800 votes
-
806 votesfeature-under-review · 59 comments · Adobe XD: Feature Requests (Read-Only) » 01 : Design mode · Admin →
-
1,809 votes
-
1,728 votes
-
2,013 votes
-
1,851 votes
-
149 votes
This is something we’d like to get more feedback on.
a) Some apps (such as Adobe Illustrator and InDesign) behave the way XD does now: reducing fill opacity (not overall object opacity) keeps the whole shadow visible but reduces its opacity in proportion with the fill color’s opacity. At zero fill opacity, the shadow is completely gone along with the fill (unless you have a border, in which case you have a thin ring-shaped shadow left).
b) Other apps (such as Photoshop or Sketch) behave differently: reducing fill opacity leaves the shadow’s opacity at full strength, but clips the shadow so you don’t see it through the translucent fill. At zero fill opacity, in the middle of the shape you can see what’s behind it completely unobscured, but outside the shape’s edges you still see the drop shadow at full strength.
Which one do people prefer? Do you need to…
-
639 votes
Hi everyone,
We’ve started working on multiple fills and borders, with plans to extend to this multiple shadows in the future.
Best,
DanAn error occurred while saving the comment -
1,792 votesfeature-started · 39 comments · Adobe XD: Feature Requests (Read-Only) » 02 : Prototype mode · Admin →
-
8,056 votes
Reopening the feature request, based on feedback.
-
52 votesfeature-in-the-backlog · 10 comments · Adobe XD: Feature Requests (Read-Only) » 01 : Design mode · Admin →
An error occurred while saving the comment When will this opportunity be finally realized? In Figma, this has been working for a long time.
I create SVG icons in Adobe Illustrator, create an artboard with a size of 18x18 pixels, leave safe areas, and therefore the physical size of the icon object is less than 18x18 pixels. When importing into XD, I have to rebuild the icon not according to its artboard, but according to its physical dimensions, and this takes a lot of time if the icon is not symmetrical.
In XD, as I understand it, the concept of "Frame" is missing, as in Figma, and therefore the icon is imported without taking into account the artboard.
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
В данном случае "уже прошло 3 года", но для Adobe это видно не срок. С каждым новым обновлением той же Figma Adobe XD всё больше выглядит некой породией на серьезный инструмент.