Jarek

My feedback

  1. 6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Jarek supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jarek commented  · 

    This one is so easy to do, yet they don't care... it's a must have!

  2. 262 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    44 comments  ·  Adobe XD: Feature Requests » 01 : Design mode  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jarek supported this idea  · 
  3. 169 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    8 comments  ·  Adobe XD: Feature Requests » 01 : Design mode  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Got it. Currently, that’s expected behavior, as double clicking and adding points converts it from a rectangle (which will maintain the corner radius) to a path, which has a different set of rules for resizing (for things like icons). I think what you want is this behavior: https://adobexd.uservoice.com/forums/353007/suggestions/12962355. If this looks good, I’ll go ahead and merge this story with that one.

    -Elaine

    Jarek supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jarek commented  · 

    Hey.

    Just wanted to say this: double-click is ultra-super-non-intuitive behavior and becomes annoying the more I use it... It should be a button of some sort or a keyboard shortcut "change to path".

  4. 99 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    34 comments  ·  Adobe XD: Feature Requests » 01 : Design mode  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jarek commented  · 

    How is this not fixed yet?

    I wonder what sort of 'logic' was spinning in the UX designer head for this 'feature'. This 'feature' is junior-level thinking, and the fact that someone from adobe xd senior team accepted this as a valid option blows my mind.

    Jarek supported this idea  · 
  5. 274 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Jarek supported this idea  · 
  6. 143 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Jarek supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jarek commented  · 

    This is "Adobe Experience Design"... Experience! How in the world did adobe designed THIS experience for the designers?

    Things like this makes this software literally unusable. After that uptade, i have to provide my client with hundreads of new links. This is utterly unprofessional. When is adobe team going to fix that?

  7. 22 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  Adobe XD: Feature Requests » 01 : Design mode  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jarek supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jarek commented  · 

    Adobe? Can anyone respond?

  8. 62 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    25 comments  ·  Adobe XD: Feature Requests » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jarek commented  · 

    Unfortunately, Adobe does this for * reasons * and whey won't change it, you can bet on it. There are serious bugs and a lot of broken ux-related things, and they won't even lift a finger. Meanwhile - more *flashy super-duper important features nobody needs or wants* and gazillion copy-n-paste responses on 3-year old bugs.

    Do yourself a favor and change to any other software (I know, but still that's one of the best options out there).

  9. 30 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jarek commented  · 

    +1, comments should be scrollable!

  10. 586 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    19 comments  ·  Adobe XD: Feature Requests » 01 : Design mode  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jarek commented  · 

    Is there any chance this feature gets finished any time soon? I know you guys have a lot of work on your shoulders, but it's been three years already...

    IMO the gradient should act just like a regular color. If I want to fill an object with a gradient, I should be able to choose it from the color palette.

  11. 144 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    31 comments  ·  Adobe XD: Feature Requests » 01 : Design mode  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    This is something we’d like to get more feedback on.

    a) Some apps (such as Adobe Illustrator and InDesign) behave the way XD does now: reducing fill opacity (not overall object opacity) keeps the whole shadow visible but reduces its opacity in proportion with the fill color’s opacity. At zero fill opacity, the shadow is completely gone along with the fill (unless you have a border, in which case you have a thin ring-shaped shadow left).

    b) Other apps (such as Photoshop or Sketch) behave differently: reducing fill opacity leaves the shadow’s opacity at full strength, but clips the shadow so you don’t see it through the translucent fill. At zero fill opacity, in the middle of the shape you can see what’s behind it completely unobscured, but outside the shape’s edges you still see the drop shadow at full strength.

    Which one do people prefer? Do you need to…

    Jarek supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jarek commented  · 

    B all the way! As already mentioned, option B gives us an opportunity to recreate option A.

    Pater Flynn - any updates on this feature?

  12. 241 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jarek commented  · 

    +1, infuriating

Feedback and Knowledge Base