Skip to content

Settings and activity

16 results found

  1. 3,888 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  2. 5,424 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  3. 156 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I have enabled co-editing on one of my files and with my questionable internet connection, it's causing no end of trouble. I need to be able to turn off the feature for this file. Or, I need to have a more graceful handling of bad connections.
    I'm continually prompted to discard my work or rename my file, but since this file is my one, central, linked asset styleguide for several other files, I can't rename the file and have that still be the case.

    If I had a flexible way to choose a replacement linked file and have all linked assets and components gracefully update, that would be one way to work around this problem.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  4. 49 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  5. 222 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Kenneth, would you mind breaking out SWF import as a separate feature request? That way people can gauge whether people want both or which one is higher priority. I’ll remove SWF from the title here so it’s focused specifically on HTML import.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  6. 344 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  7. 149 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    This is something we’d like to get more feedback on.

    a) Some apps (such as Adobe Illustrator and InDesign) behave the way XD does now: reducing fill opacity (not overall object opacity) keeps the whole shadow visible but reduces its opacity in proportion with the fill color’s opacity. At zero fill opacity, the shadow is completely gone along with the fill (unless you have a border, in which case you have a thin ring-shaped shadow left).

    b) Other apps (such as Photoshop or Sketch) behave differently: reducing fill opacity leaves the shadow’s opacity at full strength, but clips the shadow so you don’t see it through the translucent fill. At zero fill opacity, in the middle of the shape you can see what’s behind it completely unobscured, but outside the shape’s edges you still see the drop shadow at full strength.

    Which one do people prefer? Do you need to…

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Option "b" is what I find myself most often trying to do.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  8. 639 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  9. 237 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  10. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  11. 39 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I am primarily an XD user and only recently had the opportunity to learn and use Sketch for a project. One thing I found to be very useful, particularly in conjunction with the Material Design plugin was the ability to use any shape or component/symbol as a mask for objects above it in the layers list that also belonged to the same group.

    This was a convenient way to use surfaces with their shadows as a base for elements while using symbols and other elements to modify that base surface. It allowed for a flexible, yet controlled way to make more complex components that could easily be changed at the root.

    This arrangement also retained the ability to align the edges of the surface itself to the grid and didn't force the element to expand to encompass the shadow as XD currently does it.

  12. 53 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  13. 345 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  14. 381 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  15. 32 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    It would be helpful to include the name of the artboard that a view is looking at in the preview mode. Right now, my users mostly refer to "slide 2 of 17" and the only way for me to know which slide that is is to launch the prototype and click the nav arrows on the bottom. If the name of the artboard was indicated somewhere, users could share a common naming system created by and accessible to the designer.

  16. 37 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I find that I can't use my Intuos tablet with any of the tools in XD. I can't place or create rectangles, circles, lines, vectors from the pen tool, the type tool, nor can I create artboards/frames.

    This is on the new Windows 10 version of XD.