Settings and activity

  1. 667 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    RK supported this idea  · 
  2. 3,512 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    RK supported this idea  · 
  3. 7,903 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    RK supported this idea  · 
  4. 1,035 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    feature-under-review  ·  236 comments  ·  Adobe XD: Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    RK supported this idea  · 
  5. 127 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    RK commented  · 

    Integrating Framer with XD fully would fit really well. Future interfaces will always be worked out interactively and tools are mostly not ready for a lot of designers less capable of coding. Having XD added with this would be awesome!

    (@eugene: SMIL is already marked deprecated multiple, going for CSS animations and/or JS instead long-term probably makes sense)

    RK supported this idea  ·