Settings and activity
83 results found
-
68 votesZach Bruce supported this idea ·
-
126 votesZach Bruce supported this idea ·
-
19 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Zach Bruce supported this idea · -
223 votesZach Bruce supported this idea ·
-
27 votesZach Bruce supported this idea ·
-
4 votesZach Bruce supported this idea ·
-
149 votes
This is something we’d like to get more feedback on.
a) Some apps (such as Adobe Illustrator and InDesign) behave the way XD does now: reducing fill opacity (not overall object opacity) keeps the whole shadow visible but reduces its opacity in proportion with the fill color’s opacity. At zero fill opacity, the shadow is completely gone along with the fill (unless you have a border, in which case you have a thin ring-shaped shadow left).
b) Other apps (such as Photoshop or Sketch) behave differently: reducing fill opacity leaves the shadow’s opacity at full strength, but clips the shadow so you don’t see it through the translucent fill. At zero fill opacity, in the middle of the shape you can see what’s behind it completely unobscured, but outside the shape’s edges you still see the drop shadow at full strength.
Which one do people prefer? Do you need to…
Zach Bruce supported this idea · -
236 votesZach Bruce supported this idea ·
-
1,025 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Zach Bruce commentedI dig it
Zach Bruce supported this idea · -
800 votesZach Bruce supported this idea ·
-
84 votes
I can’t comment on the state of design, but what I can do for you is to merge the other story into this one, which will notify all of the other people who upvoted for it. That being said, it’s likely that people are beginning to go all-vector, which negates the need for bitmap 9-scaling if you have fixed point corners.
-Elaine
An error occurred while saving the comment Zach Bruce commentedI don't see any use for this, you can achieve most design artifacts with smart objects and effects in XD already.
-
21 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Zach Bruce commented -
513 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Zach Bruce commented@kerry I would treat that as a bug rather than a feature if it does the same with other icon fonts.
An error occurred while saving the comment Zach Bruce commentedFontAwesome works fine if you copy an icon from their cheatsheet (http://fontawesome.io/cheatsheet/), paste it in a text field on XD, set font to FontAwesome.
Glyphs integration and Outline Text would be awesome on the other hand.
-
32 votes
Moving back to no status to see what the community says overall. Thanks for sharing, guys!
-Elaine
An error occurred while saving the comment Zach Bruce commentedAs a user creating multiple grouped elements (including symbols and repeat grids) that have backgrounds objects behind them, not being able to isolate groups makes for a frustrating experience. I click to drag and multi-select elements in a group but it often kicks me out of group editing because I clicked the bg object behind it.
Zach Bruce supported this idea · -
1,728 votesZach Bruce supported this idea ·
-
1,046 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Zach Bruce commentedThis is a strange omission as a user who wants to tweak and create art assets in .XD
Zach Bruce supported this idea · -
262 votesZach Bruce supported this idea ·
-
63 votesZach Bruce supported this idea ·
-
95 votes
Hi Kieran,
Thanks for your feedback! This feature is already in our backlog – not sure when it will arrive, but we’re aware of the need for it.
Regards,
JoeZach Bruce supported this idea · -
242 votesZach Bruce supported this idea ·
As a user who wants to create an artboard based off the size of a group elements, I would like a "Create Artboard from Selection" while they're on the pasteboard. Use case would be for a modal or other element that doesn't adhere to a standard screen size.