Currently i was working on similar plugin once its done it will available on plugins store

It is interesting if there was the possibility to publish the project on a web domain in possesion or on a domain created by Adobe, as in Adobe Portfolio, without codes, like Adobe Muse.

TJ,

You might want to look into services like Zeplin.io for that service. At our company we have adjust our workflow to XD design / experience and then to bridge to dev we use Zeplin to export code, style guide, coponents and images. We have had great success with it and our devs really find ot useful and saves a ton of time.

Cheers,
David

Hi Elaine,

We're starting to use this at my company and have had some feedback on the Publish Specs option from our dev team. It appears to be causing more work for them. I believe all the information is there that is necessary for them, but laid out in a way that doesn't make for a fast + seamless build.

They think it would be useful to:
Cut out icons, and use css syntax (aka no tracking icon, use text instead)
Make attributes copy and paste-able
Export CSS?
Export HTML?

A few changes would go a long way. I think the current build of publish specs focuses a bit too much on the design workflow rather than the code workflow.

Hi Elaine, I think there are a lot of good comments here, but the main point is that there are limitations with any third party integration, but the publish link makes more work for developers. My developers are used to slicing a PSD file (I believe that's what they do...I'm no developer) and exporting as PSD isn't an option so they had to learn XD and some integration that works on windows....when I work with my designers who work on mac osx.

I have no doubt that as XD gets more robust it will allow developers to see the ultimate goal with sticky headers and transitions in prototype mode, but getting the html code out of XD will always be the ultimate goal and must be a much more significant amount of the effort spent in upgrading XD itself. Especially in lieu of paid third party integrations.

Generate Web-Ready code

It will be nice to get web-ready code like Muse does from XD. And if possible it will be nice if we can generate Android & iOS native apps.

It will be nice to get web-ready code like Muse does from XD. And if possible it will be nice if we can generate Android & iOS native apps.

Hi Elaine, Just adding a bit...
Perhaps more of a generic html/css export may be useful. Since devs will be using varying approaches and frameworks, it may be more useful to give them basic html/css for asset layout and styles from which they can pull the code they need. No matter, a dev will always have to improvise but having something to start with can speed up the tweaky work. :)

I mentioned this in the feature request for HTML export...

You should provide a comprehensive extendscript API (like other Adobe Apps) but comprehensively so that developers can write some Javascript to export the data they require

So rather than field further info on what formats to export etc, just give the power to obtain the data and let third parties develop the most requested plug-ins

At least offer css

Personaly, I'm dreaming of being able to save artboads as .xib file usable in xcode.

As another hybrid designer/developer, I agree with Daniel Vianna's comment. Other than CSS styles for assets, I cannot imagine that code exported from Xd would be terribly helpful to a developer, particularly one who is working with a front-end framework or library and would need to map Xd's export to framework-specific structures and classes. Yet, there is a real need for a more efficient loop between design and development. Much more useful than code export would be code import. I would love to be able to import components from my code library as Xd assets!

Why do we always want bloatware then when becomes bloated we complain? XD is fine as is needs a few things here and there but work beautifully.

My company won't be able to use Adobe XD unless there is the probability of exporting to XML. This feature much like the password protect feature of sharing online prototypes is a must for it to be of any value to multidisciplinary teams. We don't need another Dreamweaver which already does CSS, html, etc. I would rather see Dreamweaver get some of the tools/features that Adobe XD has then to make XD a glorified version of Dreamweaver.

look at something like zepplin or avocado or figma, this would greatly help anyone using this in the next step

XML export would be very useful for Android Application Development

I think that the require is in line of your declaration @ https://theblog.adobe.com/whats-next-for-adobe-xd-cc/
to take at first the feature of Sympli, in which it's possible to read the CSS parameters of the objects , feature present in many other Ux/Ui tools like Figma for example. It's not for programming, but for collaborate with developer.

The second step hoply will be export css/html separated file.

Please do not transform Adobe XD into another Dreamweaver. I think generating accurate CSS for styles is good enough. It's probably better to allow third parties to develop plugins, like Adobe XD to bootstrap or Adobe XD to react. AirbNB is doing this for sketch: http://airbnb.io/react-sketchapp/. So open the API and let third party people do their plugins for specific cases. As a hybrid designer / coder I agree with some folks that creating good html / javascript via UI is unrealistic. Other stuff related to UI tools are way more important, and focusing on the core logic of the software. Photoshop was great for me for 15 years, but as people stuffed more features like 3D it became too sluggish and busy. As long as the apps can export/import or work in sync it's better to develop different tools, the same I don't expect photoshop or adobe XD to replace illustrator for complex illustrations

I would approach this iteratively. html/css first as this seems to be easier, then for native mobile.

Hello Elaine,
Well, to be able to generate style codes(HTML-CSS/XML/Swift)

And also JavaScript for interactions and animations.