Export whole artboards (or entire project) as HTML
It would be great to Export Prototypes as pure HTML Projects. I am working a lot on Multiscreen apps, where I mostly use Serveal Webcontainers Running on several Screens, to develop those Applications.
-
Anonymous commented
if only we could export from XD to: "HTML (with style)".
Or maybe even better: Export as HTML+CSS+JS.
-
Melanie commented
I would like to be able to bring what I create in XD to the phone mode of Muse then be able to populate a desktop/ipad version with the elements I created/placed in XD and brought into Muse.
-
Konstantin Volia commented
Yea, I also need offline version of prototype.
Just make export option - HTML. Or, at least, make "preview" downloadable.
-
Anonymous commented
In my opinion it would be great if xd could export ArtBoards as HTML based on bootstrap. I think the integration of bootstrap could be next level of Adobe XD.
-
phil tuna commented
» EEEEeeeeeEEEEEVERYONE needs this feature for XD.
My company is talking about bailing on Xd because it can't export code for the developers to quickly code their pages.
-
Anonymous commented
Hey Adobe, when is this feature coming? Export to html
-
Martin Kováč commented
YES PLEASE!!!
-
Anonymous commented
Hey Adobe, when is this feature coming? A major I'd think
-
Anonymous commented
Hey Adobe - Please make XD export the needed CSS and JS for an export to Dreamweaver and Muse! Great products - would be incredibly powerful if we could integrate them.
-
Jehonel Porte commented
1-SERIA BUENO QUE SE PUDIERA EXPORTAR EN HTML PARA PODER CONVERTIRLO EN ADOBE PHONEGAP BUILDER Y CREAL UNA APP PARA LOS DIFERENTES DISPOSITIVOS MOBILES, O GENERAR DIRECTAMENTE UNA EXPORTACION A LOS DIFERENTES FORMATOS DE DISPOSITIVOS IOS, ANDROID WINDOW.
2-TAMBIEN PODRIA AÑADIR WIDGETS COMO ADOBE MUSE
3-TAMBIEN SE PUDIERA GENERAR UN PANEL DE ICONO PARA CONVERTIRSE EN APLICACION MOVIL.
4-POR ULTIMO EN LA EXPORTACION VINCULAR LA APP CON LAS DIFERENTES PLATAFORMAS DE APLICACIONES MOVILES APPLE DEVELOPER PROGRAM PARA APP STORE, GOOGLE PLAY DEVELOPER CONSOLE, Y WINDOW STORE
-
Anonymous commented
我注意到 . 最近两次的更新 . 使XD能像sketch那样分享设计了 . 但是 . XD只能分享链接 . 但sketch可以把 切图\设计分享 全部整合在本地 . 我认为这是一种非常方便好用的功能 .
-
Daniel G. commented
I have extremely in depth ideas on how to integrate this into Adobe Xd, as this is my full time work, i use Adobe Xd 12hrs a day 5-6 days a week when designing. Thank you for an amazing product.
-
Daniel G. commented
IDEA:
As a full time Web Developer, designing in HTML and CSS is beyond annoyingly slow, padding, boarders, color, transparency, alignment, Flex boxes, etc are difficult to work with.
Adobe Xd makes it easy to design and prototype UI.
Web Languages such as Javascript, HTML, and CSS have been around for a long time, CSS is the style (colors, transparency, boarders, corners etc...), HTML is the layering, and Javascript is the functionality (on click, the UI changes color for example, or moves from one side the screen to the other).I think Adobe Xd could be expanded to meet the needs of web developers needing speedy prototyping and creating of Javascript, HTML, and CSS.
Design Mode:
Here is how this could work.
HTML:
- Make Artboard in Adobe Xd = Webpage
- Draw Ellipse
- Ellipse DIV added to HTML file and is assigned the style of Ellipse01
- Ellipse01 style created in CSS file with (color, size, position on the screen, boarder, orientation, etc...)
- Add drag and drop color change javascript animation onto Ellipse from Function Bar > Animations > Button on click
- This adds a javascript file with the function that fires on click
- With the inspector of this Ellipse object, actions can be added, that would occur on click (such as changing the color, and size of the button)Export as Web Page: (To Local HD)
On export you would have three files per artboard:
- Javascript
- HTML
- CSSWhen opening HTML file the artboard would appear in web - browser as a web page, either fixed screen size or flexible depending on what settings the designer has set.
Contact me for more details: danielglassford@icloud.com
I am founder of a financial company and could talk on the phone or through email with one of your developers to run ideas past him/her related to this feature request. -
Anonymous commented
Hope they would integrate this with Adobe Dreamweaver or some other software.
-
AC commented
Adobe will no be the first .. there are already aps doing this such as https://www.rapidui.io
Sketch is already working on this. But it will be nice to let the html and css manual coding as part of the past and finally make it happen with adobe -
Alice Butterick commented
Come on Adobe it's gonna happen soon, put your Sensei to work, why not be the first!
The code school lobby will hate you but designers everywhere will LOVE you.
It's such a fun app, Thank You! -
kathir commented
if XD has converting prototype to clean html code, will save time and development cost
-
Chris Falkenstein commented
Export to HTML? Maybe I'm old school, but I can't imagine how this would actually produce good markup based on a design. How would Xd possibly determine semantic markup based on design elements. This is a tool for design. Let's keep that way.
I don't ask my coffee maker to produce a stellar day.
-
K dowler commented
Yeah, until XD can work with the rest of Adobe's web development tools. This product won't be used in our productions. Most designers can build at least in Muse, which can supply ugly but usable code to the programers. In big shops where there are user designers that only design interfaces but not the functional code is this of use.
I hope this is part of a past when in the future we look back on and say, "remember when we built prototypes that you had to rebuild from scratch to actually use?' -
Anonymous commented
I was in the neighborhood and noticed the "needs more information" too, but can't easily find what information is needed.
There is a related feature request for export to interactive PDF, which shows as "feature under review". Really there isn't a difference between the two requests, except one makes many HTML f lies and the other makes one PDF. So, why is this one understandable:
but the HTML one isn't?